Eckerlein, Nicole ; Roth, Anne ; Engelschalk, Tobias ; Steuer, Gabriele ; Schmitz, Bernhard ; Dresel, Markus (2024)
The Role of Motivational Regulation in Exam Preparation: Results From a Standardized Diary Study.
In: Frontiers in Psychology, 2019, 10
doi: 10.26083/tuprints-00015750
Article, Secondary publication, Publisher's Version
|
Text
fpsyg-10-00081.pdf Copyright Information: CC BY 4.0 International - Creative Commons, Attribution. Download (843kB) | Preview |
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Type of entry: | Secondary publication |
Title: | The Role of Motivational Regulation in Exam Preparation: Results From a Standardized Diary Study |
Language: | English |
Date: | 5 March 2024 |
Place of Publication: | Darmstadt |
Year of primary publication: | 5 February 2019 |
Place of primary publication: | Lausanne |
Publisher: | Frontiers Media S.A. |
Journal or Publication Title: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Volume of the journal: | 10 |
Collation: | 9 Seiten |
DOI: | 10.26083/tuprints-00015750 |
Corresponding Links: | |
Origin: | Secondary publication DeepGreen |
Abstract: | Previous studies have shown that the use of motivational regulation strategies has the potential to sustain invested effort and persistence in the learning process. Combining different methods (questionnaires and standardized diaries), the present study aimed to determine the role of motivational regulation in an exam preparation period. Motivational regulation is differentiated in a quantitative (extent of strategy use) and a qualitative (planning, implementing, monitoring, and correcting strategy use) aspect. One hundred and fifteen university students reported the quantity and quality of their motivational regulation strategy use in a pretest and kept a standardized learning diary focused on motivational difficulties and invested effort over a 14-day period just before an exam in their studies. Exam performance was assessed afterward. Results revealed positive effects of both aspects of motivational regulation on invested effort in exam preparation and exam performance. Moreover, a high quality of motivational regulation was associated with reduced negative effects of motivational difficulties on invested effort during studying—implying that motivational regulation can buffer against specific motivational problems occurring in the learning process. |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | self-regulated learning, motivational regulation, quality of strategy use, standardized learning diary, higher education |
Identification Number: | Artikel-ID: 81 |
Status: | Publisher's Version |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:tuda-tuprints-157506 |
Additional Information: | Specialty section: This article was submitted to Educational Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology |
Classification DDC: | 100 Philosophy and psychology > 150 Psychology |
Divisions: | 03 Department of Human Sciences > Institute for Psychology |
Date Deposited: | 05 Mar 2024 13:39 |
Last Modified: | 24 Jun 2024 14:08 |
SWORD Depositor: | Deep Green |
URI: | https://tuprints.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/id/eprint/15750 |
PPN: | 519351711 |
Export: |
View Item |