Rosenberger, Philipp ; Holder, Martin Friedrich ; Huch, Sebastian ; Winner, Hermann ; Fleck, Tobias ; Zofka, Marc René ; Zöllner, Johann Marius ; D'Hondt, Thomas ; Wassermann, Benjamin (2019)
Benchmarking and Functional Decomposition of Automotive Lidar Sensor Models.
2019 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV). Paris, France (09.06.2019-12.06.2019)
doi: 10.1109/IVS.2019.8814081
Conference or Workshop Item, Secondary publication, Postprint
|
Text
Benchmarking_and_Functional_Decomposition_of_Automotive_Lidar_Sensor_Models.pdf - Accepted Version Copyright Information: In Copyright. Download (465kB) | Preview |
Item Type: | Conference or Workshop Item |
---|---|
Type of entry: | Secondary publication |
Title: | Benchmarking and Functional Decomposition of Automotive Lidar Sensor Models |
Language: | German |
Date: | 9 June 2019 |
Place of Publication: | Darmstadt |
Year of primary publication: | 2019 |
Event Title: | 2019 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) |
Event Location: | Paris, France |
Event Dates: | 09.06.2019-12.06.2019 |
DOI: | 10.1109/IVS.2019.8814081 |
Origin: | Secondary publication |
Abstract: | Simulation-based testing is seen as a major requirement for the safety validation of highly automated driving. One crucial part of such test architectures are models of environment perception sensors such as camera, lidar and radar sensors. Currently, an objective evaluation and the comparison of different modeling approaches for automotive lidar sensors are still a challenge. In this work, a real lidar sensor system used for object recognition is first functionally decomposed. The resulting sequence of processing blocks and interfaces is then mapped onto simulation methods. Subsequently, metrics applied to the aforementioned interfaces are derived, enabling a quantitative comparison between simulated and real sensor data at different steps of the processing pipeline. Benchmarks for several existing sensor models at a concrete selected interface are performed using those metrics by comparing them to measurements gained from the real sensor. Finally, we outline how metrics on low-level interfaces can correlate with results on more abstract ones. A major achievement of this work lies within the commonly accepted interfaces and a common understanding of real and virtual lidar sensor systems and, even more important, an initial guideline for the quantitative comparison of sensor models with the ambition to support future validation of virtual sensor models. |
Status: | Postprint |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:tuda-tuprints-90601 |
Classification DDC: | 600 Technology, medicine, applied sciences > 620 Engineering and machine engineering |
Divisions: | 16 Department of Mechanical Engineering 16 Department of Mechanical Engineering > Institute of Automotive Engineering (FZD) 16 Department of Mechanical Engineering > Institute of Automotive Engineering (FZD) > Driver Assistance 16 Department of Mechanical Engineering > Institute of Automotive Engineering (FZD) > Safety 16 Department of Mechanical Engineering > Institute of Automotive Engineering (FZD) > Test Methods |
Date Deposited: | 18 Sep 2019 13:19 |
Last Modified: | 24 May 2023 09:24 |
URI: | https://tuprints.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/id/eprint/9060 |
PPN: | |
Export: |
View Item |