TU Darmstadt / ULB / TUprints

„Wer gegen Atomkraft ist, ist gegen Klimaschutz“: Eine Argumentationsanalyse der Debatte zur Laufzeitverlängerung der Atomkraft im deutschen Bundestag

Agyemang, Jasmin
eds.: Freudenberg, Johanna ; Rhein, Lisa ; Simon, Niklas (2024)
„Wer gegen Atomkraft ist, ist gegen Klimaschutz“: Eine Argumentationsanalyse der Debatte zur Laufzeitverlängerung der Atomkraft im deutschen Bundestag.
In: Exploring Eco-Discourses. Perspektiven - Ansätze - Methoden
doi: 10.26083/tuprints-00028137
Book Section, Primary publication, Publisher's Version

[img] Text
Agyemang_2024_Wer gegen Atomkraft ist, ist gegen Klimaschutz.pdf
Copyright Information: CC BY 4.0 International - Creative Commons, Attribution.

Download (371kB)
Item Type: Book Section
Type of entry: Primary publication
Title: „Wer gegen Atomkraft ist, ist gegen Klimaschutz“: Eine Argumentationsanalyse der Debatte zur Laufzeitverlängerung der Atomkraft im deutschen Bundestag
Language: German
Date: 2 December 2024
Place of Publication: Darmstadt
Book Title: Exploring Eco-Discourses. Perspektiven - Ansätze - Methoden
DOI: 10.26083/tuprints-00028137
Corresponding Links:
Abstract:

With the beginning of the Russian-Ukraine conflict in February 2022 the German energy supply faced major challenges. One of the most disputed solutions obtains the term extension of the three last nuclear power plants. With the attack of the Ukrainian nuclear power plant in Saporischschja a new evaluation of nuclear power and its dangers was needed. The controversy of nuclear power and its advantages and disadvantages was discussed in German parliament over a long time. In the end an extension of term until 15th April 2023 was legislated. This paper traces the argumentation about nuclear power in parliamentary debate. The question to be asked here is whether and in what way eco-political arguments are relevant in the conflict of term extensions. The study has shown that lots of arguments are used to point out its cuts in both ways. However eco-political arguments are profoundly important. They are often embedded in typical political strategies of convincing, e. g. in showing the best image of the own party or person.

Uncontrolled Keywords: argumentation, nuclear power, parliamentary communication, political communication, environment
Status: Publisher's Version
URN: urn:nbn:de:tuda-tuprints-281371
Additional Information:

Die Beiträge des Bandes beruhen zum Großteil auf den gehaltenen Vorträgen, setzen aber zum Teil einen anderen Fokus: Workshop "Exploring Eco-Discourses – eine interdisziplinäre Research School", 09.10.2023-11.10.2023, Darmstadt, Germany.

Classification DDC: 300 Social sciences > 333.7 Natural resources, energy and environment
400 Language > 400 Language, linguistics
400 Language > 430 German
Divisions: 02 Department of History and Social Science > Institut für Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft > German Linguistics
Date Deposited: 02 Dec 2024 09:25
Last Modified: 05 Dec 2024 11:55
URI: https://tuprints.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/id/eprint/28137
PPN: 52434051X
Export:
Actions (login required)
View Item View Item