TU Darmstadt / ULB / TUprints

Impact of Hydrological Modellers’ Decisions and Attitude on the Performance of a Calibrated Conceptual Catchment Model: Results from a ‘Modelling Contest’

Bormann, Helge ; De Brito, Mariana Madruga ; Charchousi, Despoina ; Chatzistratis, Dimitris ; David, Amrei ; Grosser, Paula Farina ; Kebschull, Jenny ; Konis, Alexandros ; Koutalakis, Paschalis ; Korali, Alkistis ; Krauzig, Naomi ; Meier, Jessica ; Meliadou, Varvara ; Meinhardt, Markus ; Munnelly, Kieran ; Stephan, Christiane ; De Vos, Leon Frederik ; Dietrich, Jörg ; Tzoraki, Ourania (2024)
Impact of Hydrological Modellers’ Decisions and Attitude on the Performance of a Calibrated Conceptual Catchment Model: Results from a ‘Modelling Contest’.
In: Hydrology, 2018, 5 (4)
doi: 10.26083/tuprints-00016645
Article, Secondary publication, Publisher's Version

[img]
Preview
Text
hydrology-05-00064.pdf
Copyright Information: CC BY 4.0 International - Creative Commons, Attribution.

Download (3MB) | Preview
Item Type: Article
Type of entry: Secondary publication
Title: Impact of Hydrological Modellers’ Decisions and Attitude on the Performance of a Calibrated Conceptual Catchment Model: Results from a ‘Modelling Contest’
Language: English
Date: 16 January 2024
Place of Publication: Darmstadt
Year of primary publication: 2018
Place of primary publication: Basel
Publisher: MDPI
Journal or Publication Title: Hydrology
Volume of the journal: 5
Issue Number: 4
Collation: 13 Seiten
DOI: 10.26083/tuprints-00016645
Corresponding Links:
Origin: Secondary publication DeepGreen
Abstract:

In this study, 17 hydrologists with different experience in hydrological modelling applied the same conceptual catchment model (HBV) to a Greek catchment, using identical data and model code. Calibration was performed manually. Subsequently, the modellers were asked for their experience, their calibration strategy, and whether they enjoyed the exercise. The exercise revealed that there is considerable modellers’ uncertainty even among the experienced modellers. It seemed to be equally important whether the modellers followed a good calibration strategy, and whether they enjoyed modelling. The exercise confirmed previous studies about the benefit of model ensembles: Different combinations of the simulation results (median, mean) outperformed the individual model simulations, while filtering the simulations even improved the quality of the model ensembles. Modellers’ experience, decisions, and attitude, therefore, have an impact on the hydrological model application and should be considered as part of hydrological modelling uncertainty.

Uncontrolled Keywords: conceptual hydrological model, HBV, modellers’ decisions, model ensemble, modellers’ uncertainty
Status: Publisher's Version
URN: urn:nbn:de:tuda-tuprints-166451
Classification DDC: 500 Science and mathematics > 550 Earth sciences and geology
600 Technology, medicine, applied sciences > 624 Civil engineering and environmental protection engineering
900 History and geography > 910 Geography and travel
Divisions: 13 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Sciences > Institute of Hydraulic and Water Resources Engineering > Engineering Hydrology and Water Management
Date Deposited: 16 Jan 2024 10:27
Last Modified: 28 Mar 2024 08:57
SWORD Depositor: Deep Green
URI: https://tuprints.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/id/eprint/16645
PPN: 515298530
Export:
Actions (login required)
View Item View Item