Sanetra, Dennis ; Berger, Johanna ; Hartlieb, Margarita ; Simons, Nadja K. ; Walther, Genevieve ; Blüthgen, Nico ; Staab, Michael (2024)
Disentangling how urbanisation influences moth diversity in grasslands.
In: Insect Conservation and Diversity, 2024, 17 (2)
doi: 10.26083/tuprints-00027120
Article, Secondary publication, Publisher's Version
Text
ICAD_ICAD12713.pdf Copyright Information: CC BY-NC 4.0 International - Creative Commons, Attribution NonCommercial. Download (4MB) |
|
Text
(Supplement)
icad12713-sup-0001-supinfo.docx Copyright Information: CC BY-NC 4.0 International - Creative Commons, Attribution NonCommercial. Download (1MB) |
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Type of entry: | Secondary publication |
Title: | Disentangling how urbanisation influences moth diversity in grasslands |
Language: | English |
Date: | 11 June 2024 |
Place of Publication: | Darmstadt |
Year of primary publication: | March 2024 |
Place of primary publication: | Oxford |
Publisher: | Wiley-Blackwell |
Journal or Publication Title: | Insect Conservation and Diversity |
Volume of the journal: | 17 |
Issue Number: | 2 |
DOI: | 10.26083/tuprints-00027120 |
Corresponding Links: | |
Origin: | Secondary publication DeepGreen |
Abstract: | 1. Urban areas have profound impacts on local species diversity and composition through a set of intertwined changes in the environment. As the world is rapidly urbanising while simultaneously facing a biodiversity crisis, a better understanding of how urbanisation influences biodiversity is necessary. 2. To test if and how urbanisation influences moth diversity and whether urbanisation is acting directly or indirectly via urbanisation‐induced increased habitat isolation, smaller habitat area, higher light pollution and increased mowing intensity, we sampled moths with light trapping in 20 grasslands in the urban core of the city of Darmstadt (southwestern Germany) and 20 grasslands in the surrounding area. 3. Moth abundance and diversity decreased with increasing urbanisation. Smaller habitat area and high mowing intensity reduced moth abundance, while other environmental variables including isolation and light pollution had only indirect effects. High levels of urbanisation were associated with reduced moth abundance, which in turn drove declines in diversity. Urbanised sites favoured generalist species and differed in species composition compared to sites in the surrounding. 4. The results show that urbanisation is directly reducing moth abundance and diversity in cities. The negative effect of urbanisation is further attenuated by habitat fragmentation and high mowing intensity, which are both known drivers of biodiversity decline in urban areas and beyond. 5. While urbanisation itself is often irreversible, reducing mowing intensity and preserving larger grassland areas could facilitate moths and other taxa in and around cities. |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | artificial light at night, Lepidoptera, light trapping, moths, mowing, species communities, species diversity, urban ecology |
Status: | Publisher's Version |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:tuda-tuprints-271201 |
Additional Information: | Special Issue: The Ecology and Conservation of Urban Insects |
Classification DDC: | 500 Science and mathematics > 570 Life sciences, biology 500 Science and mathematics > 590 Animals (zoology) |
Divisions: | 10 Department of Biology > Ecological Networks |
Date Deposited: | 11 Jun 2024 11:55 |
Last Modified: | 13 Jun 2024 09:31 |
SWORD Depositor: | Deep Green |
URI: | https://tuprints.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/id/eprint/27120 |
PPN: | 519042379 |
Export: |
View Item |