Ufrecht, Christian ; Giese, Enno (2024)
Reply to “Comment on ‘Perturbative operator approach to high-precision light-pulse atom interferometry’”.
In: Physical Review A, 2020, 102 (2)
doi: 10.26083/tuprints-00027060
Article, Secondary publication, Publisher's Version
Text
PhysRevA.102.027302.pdf Copyright Information: In Copyright. Download (118kB) |
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Type of entry: | Secondary publication |
Title: | Reply to “Comment on ‘Perturbative operator approach to high-precision light-pulse atom interferometry’” |
Language: | English |
Date: | 13 August 2024 |
Place of Publication: | Darmstadt |
Year of primary publication: | 2020 |
Place of primary publication: | Woodbury, NY |
Publisher: | American Physical Society |
Journal or Publication Title: | Physical Review A |
Volume of the journal: | 102 |
Issue Number: | 2 |
Collation: | 2 Seiten |
DOI: | 10.26083/tuprints-00027060 |
Corresponding Links: | |
Origin: | Secondary publication service |
Abstract: | Recently, we introduced [C. Ufrecht and E. Giese, Phys. Rev. A 101, 053615 (2020)] a technique to calculate the phase of light-pulse atom interferometers caused by the presence of perturbation potentials and underlined its power by an illustrative example. In the preceding Comment [B. Dubetsky, Phys. Rev. A 102, 027301 (2020)], it was pointed out that other, less idealized situations could have been calculated as well. Our Reply emphasizes that our method is correct, the results from our example can be trivially generalized to other perturbations, and intricate effects of local environments can be even more prominent but also treated by our technique. |
Status: | Publisher's Version |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:tuda-tuprints-270604 |
Classification DDC: | 500 Science and mathematics > 530 Physics |
Date Deposited: | 13 Aug 2024 13:47 |
Last Modified: | 24 Sep 2024 09:51 |
URI: | https://tuprints.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/id/eprint/27060 |
PPN: | 521653746 |
Export: |
View Item |