TU Darmstadt / ULB / TUprints

Comparison of Test Methods for Determining the Tensile Strength of Soil and Weak Rocks

Wang, Rong ; Li, Yanrong ; Lv, Dongdong ; Zhao, Weichao ; Zhang, Chaobo ; Zachert, Hauke ; Eichhoff, Gerald ; Beroya-Eitner, Mary Antonette (2022)
Comparison of Test Methods for Determining the Tensile Strength of Soil and Weak Rocks.
In: Frontiers in Earth Science, 2022, 10
doi: 10.26083/tuprints-00021151
Article, Secondary publication, Publisher's Version

[img] Text
Copyright Information: CC BY 4.0 International - Creative Commons, Attribution.

Download (2MB)
Item Type: Article
Type of entry: Secondary publication
Title: Comparison of Test Methods for Determining the Tensile Strength of Soil and Weak Rocks
Language: English
Date: 9 May 2022
Place of Publication: Darmstadt
Year of primary publication: 2022
Publisher: Frontiers Media S.A.
Journal or Publication Title: Frontiers in Earth Science
Volume of the journal: 10
Collation: 12 Seiten
DOI: 10.26083/tuprints-00021151
Corresponding Links:
Origin: Secondary publication DeepGreen

Tensile strength is a key parameter governing tensile cracking and subsequent failure of soil or rock mass. Existing methods for measuring tensile strength are mainly designed for hard materials and come with inherent problems. As such, they are continuously being adapted and improved by the scientific community. In line with this effort, we recently developed two new tensile test methods for application to soil and weak rocks, namely, the inner hole fracturing test (IHFT) and horizontal compression test (HCT). In this study, we compared the performance of these newly developed methods and the three most commonly used approaches for tensile strength determination, namely, the uniaxial direct tensile test (UDTT), Brazilian test (BT) and three-point bending test (TPBT). Results show that IHFT and HCT exhibit distinct advantages over the three conventional methods when testing soil and weak rocks: first, IHFT and HCT can overcome the eccentric force problem that is a main challenge in UDTT and BT, and second, results obtained from these tests are highly reproducible and stable. Between IHFT and HCT, the latter is found more suitable for routine laboratory testing because of simpler and easier procedure, more stable and reliable results and uniform stress distribution within specimens.

Uncontrolled Keywords: tensile strength, test methods, test apparatus, soil and weak rock, comparison
Status: Publisher's Version
URN: urn:nbn:de:tuda-tuprints-211513
Classification DDC: 500 Science and mathematics > 550 Earth sciences and geology
600 Technology, medicine, applied sciences > 600 Technology
600 Technology, medicine, applied sciences > 620 Engineering and machine engineering
Divisions: 13 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Sciences > Institute of Geotechnics
Date Deposited: 09 May 2022 13:34
Last Modified: 06 Dec 2023 09:43
SWORD Depositor: Deep Green
URI: https://tuprints.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/id/eprint/21151
PPN: 499794427
Actions (login required)
View Item View Item