TU Darmstadt / ULB / TUprints

Comparison of Eulerian QBMM and classical Eulerian–Eulerian method for the simulation of polydisperse bubbly flows

Li, Dongyue ; Marchisio, Daniele ; Hasse, Christian ; Lucas, Dirk (2023)
Comparison of Eulerian QBMM and classical Eulerian–Eulerian method for the simulation of polydisperse bubbly flows.
In: AIChE Journal, 2019, 65 (11)
doi: 10.26083/tuprints-00016157
Article, Secondary publication, Publisher's Version

[img]
Preview
Text
AIC_AIC16732.pdf
Copyright Information: CC BY 4.0 International - Creative Commons, Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview
Item Type: Article
Type of entry: Secondary publication
Title: Comparison of Eulerian QBMM and classical Eulerian–Eulerian method for the simulation of polydisperse bubbly flows
Language: English
Date: 4 December 2023
Place of Publication: Darmstadt
Year of primary publication: 2019
Place of primary publication: Hoboken
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell
Journal or Publication Title: AIChE Journal
Volume of the journal: 65
Issue Number: 11
Collation: 14 Seiten
DOI: 10.26083/tuprints-00016157
Corresponding Links:
Origin: Secondary publication DeepGreen
Abstract:

The spatial gas distribution of poly‐disperse bubbly flows depends greatly on the bubble size. To reflect the resulting polycelerity, more than two momentum balance equations (typically for the gas and liquid phases) have to be considered, as done in the multifluid approach. The inhomogeneous multiple‐size group model follows this approach, also combined with a population balance model. As an alternative, in a previous work, an Eulerian quadrature‐based moments method (E‐QBMM) was implemented in OpenFOAM; however, only the drag force was included. In this work, different nondrag forces (lift, wall lubrication, and turbulent dispersion) are added to enable more complex test cases to be simulated. Simulation results obtained using E‐QBMM are compared with the classical E–E method and validated against experimental data for different test cases. The results show that there is good agreement between E‐QBMM and E–E methods for mono‐disperse cases, but E‐QBMM can better simulate the separation and segregation of small and large bubbles.

Uncontrolled Keywords: bubbly flow, E–E method, E‐QBMM, non‐drag forces, wall peak
Identification Number: e16732
Status: Publisher's Version
URN: urn:nbn:de:tuda-tuprints-161575
Classification DDC: 600 Technology, medicine, applied sciences > 620 Engineering and machine engineering
Divisions: 16 Department of Mechanical Engineering > Simulation of reactive Thermo-Fluid Systems (STFS)
Date Deposited: 04 Dec 2023 13:48
Last Modified: 07 Dec 2023 10:55
SWORD Depositor: Deep Green
URI: https://tuprints.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/id/eprint/16157
PPN: 513653058
Export:
Actions (login required)
View Item View Item