TU Darmstadt / ULB / TUprints

Charge site manipulation to enhance top‐down fragmentation efficiency

Habeck, Tanja ; Maciel, Edvaldo Vasconcelos Soares ; Kretschmer, Kevin ; Lermyte, Frederik (2024)
Charge site manipulation to enhance top‐down fragmentation efficiency.
In: Proteomics : Proteomics and Systems Biology, 2024, 24 (3-4)
doi: 10.26083/tuprints-00027109
Article, Secondary publication, Publisher's Version

[img] Text
PMIC_PMIC13667.pdf
Copyright Information: CC BY 4.0 International - Creative Commons, Attribution.

Download (950kB)
[img] Text (Supplement)
pmic13667-sup-0001-suppmat.pdf
Copyright Information: CC BY 4.0 International - Creative Commons, Attribution.

Download (800kB)
Item Type: Article
Type of entry: Secondary publication
Title: Charge site manipulation to enhance top‐down fragmentation efficiency
Language: English
Date: 17 June 2024
Place of Publication: Darmstadt
Year of primary publication: February 2024
Place of primary publication: Weinheim
Publisher: Wiley-VCH
Journal or Publication Title: Proteomics : Proteomics and Systems Biology
Volume of the journal: 24
Issue Number: 3-4
Collation: 10 Seiten
DOI: 10.26083/tuprints-00027109
Corresponding Links:
Origin: Secondary publication DeepGreen
Abstract:

In recent years, top‐down mass spectrometry has become a widely used approach to study proteoforms; however, improving sequence coverage remains an important goal. Here, two different proteins, α‐synuclein and bovine carbonic anhydrase, were subjected to top‐down collision‐induced dissociation (CID) after electrospray ionisation. Two high‐boiling solvents, DMSO and propylene carbonate, were added to the protein solution in low concentration (2%) and the effects on the top‐down fragmentation patterns of the proteins were systematically investigated. Each sample was measured in triplicate, which revealed highly reproducible differences in the top‐down CID fragmentation patterns in the presence of a solution additive, even if the same precursor charge state was isolated in the quadrupole of the instrument. Further investigation supports the solution condition‐dependent selective formation of different protonation site isomers as the underlying cause of these differences. Higher sequence coverage was often observed in the presence of additives, and the benefits of this approach became even more evident when datasets from different solution conditions were combined, as increases up to 35% in cleavage coverage were obtained. Overall, this approach therefore represents a promising opportunity to increase top‐down fragmentation efficiency.

Uncontrolled Keywords: electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI‐MS), mass spectrometry, top‐down proteomics
Identification Number: Artikel-ID: 2300082
Status: Publisher's Version
URN: urn:nbn:de:tuda-tuprints-271094
Additional Information:

Special Issue: Top‐down proteomics and proteoforms

Classification DDC: 500 Science and mathematics > 540 Chemistry
500 Science and mathematics > 570 Life sciences, biology
Divisions: 07 Department of Chemistry > Clemens-Schöpf-Institut > Fachgebiet Biochemie
Date Deposited: 17 Jun 2024 12:38
Last Modified: 19 Jun 2024 06:19
SWORD Depositor: Deep Green
URI: https://tuprints.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/id/eprint/27109
PPN: 519216636
Export:
Actions (login required)
View Item View Item