TU Darmstadt / ULB / TUprints

Evaluation of tools for describing, reproducing and reusing scientific workflows

Diercks, Philipp ; Gläser, Dennis ; Lünsdorf, Ontje ; Selzer, Michael ; Flemisch, Bernd ; Unger, Jörg F. (2024)
Evaluation of tools for describing, reproducing and reusing scientific workflows.
In: ing.grid : FAIR data management in engineering sciences, 2023, 1 (1)
doi: 10.26083/tuprints-00026406
Article, Secondary publication, Publisher's Version

[img] Text
inggrid-3726-diercks.pdf
Copyright Information: CC BY 4.0 International - Creative Commons, Attribution.

Download (418kB)
[img] Text
inggrid-3726-diercks.xml
Copyright Information: CC BY 4.0 International - Creative Commons, Attribution.

Download (137kB)
Item Type: Article
Type of entry: Secondary publication
Title: Evaluation of tools for describing, reproducing and reusing scientific workflows
Language: English
Date: 25 March 2024
Place of Publication: Darmstadt
Year of primary publication: 25 August 2023
Place of primary publication: Darmstadt
Publisher: Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Darmstadt
Journal or Publication Title: ing.grid : FAIR data management in engineering sciences
Volume of the journal: 1
Issue Number: 1
Collation: 27 Seiten
DOI: 10.26083/tuprints-00026406
Corresponding Links:
Origin: Secondary publication from TUjournals
Abstract:

In the field of computational science and engineering, workflows often entail the application of various software, for instance, for simulation or pre- and postprocessing. Typically, these components have to be combined in arbitrarily complex workflows to address a specific research question. In order for peer researchers to understand, reproduce and (re)use the findings of a scientific publication, several challenges have to be addressed. For instance, the employed workflow has to be automated and information on all used software must be available for a reproduction of the results. Moreover, the results must be traceable and the workflow documented and readable to allow for external verification and greater trust. In this paper, existing workflow management systems (WfMSs) are discussed regarding their suitability for describing, reproducing and reusing scientific workflows. To this end, a set of general requirements for WfMSs were deduced from user stories that we deem relevant in the domain of computational science and engineering. On the basis of an exemplary workflow implementation, publicly hosted at GitHub (https://github.com/BAMresearch/NFDI4IngScientificWorkflowRequirements), a selection of different WfMSs is compared with respect to these requirements, to support fellow scientists in identifying the WfMSs that best suit their requirements.

Uncontrolled Keywords: FAIR, reproducibility, scientific workflows, tool comparison, workflow management
Status: Publisher's Version
URN: urn:nbn:de:tuda-tuprints-264067
Classification DDC: 600 Technology, medicine, applied sciences > 620 Engineering and machine engineering
Divisions: 16 Department of Mechanical Engineering > Institute for Fluid Systems (FST) (since 01.10.2006) > Research Data Management and Digital Literacy
Date Deposited: 25 Mar 2024 13:25
Last Modified: 25 Mar 2024 13:25
URI: https://tuprints.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/id/eprint/26406
PPN:
Export:
Actions (login required)
View Item View Item