Weirich, Christopher ; Lin, Yandan ; Khanh, Tran Quoc (2022)
Evidence for human-centric in-vehicle lighting: Part 2 — Modeling illumination based on color-opponents.
In: Frontiers in Neuroscience, 2022, 16
doi: 10.26083/tuprints-00022498
Article, Secondary publication, Publisher's Version
Text
fnins-16-969125.pdf Copyright Information: CC BY 4.0 International - Creative Commons, Attribution. Download (5MB) |
|
Text
Data_Sheet_1.PDF Copyright Information: CC BY 4.0 International - Creative Commons, Attribution. Download (626kB) |
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Type of entry: | Secondary publication |
Title: | Evidence for human-centric in-vehicle lighting: Part 2 — Modeling illumination based on color-opponents |
Language: | English |
Date: | 24 October 2022 |
Place of Publication: | Darmstadt |
Year of primary publication: | 2022 |
Publisher: | Frontiers Media S.A. |
Journal or Publication Title: | Frontiers in Neuroscience |
Volume of the journal: | 16 |
Collation: | 19 Seiten |
DOI: | 10.26083/tuprints-00022498 |
Corresponding Links: | |
Origin: | Secondary publication DeepGreen |
Abstract: | Illumination preference models are usually defined in a static scenery, rating common-colored objects by a single scale or semantic differentials. Recently, it was reported that two to three illumination characteristics are necessary to define a high correlation in a bright office-like environment. However, white-light illumination preferences for vehicle-occupants in a dynamic semi- to full automated modern driving context are missing. Here we conducted a global free access online survey using VR engines to create 360° sRGB static in-vehicle sceneries. A total of 164 participants from China and Europe answered three levels in our self-hosted questionnaire by using mobile access devices. First, the absolute perceptional difference should be defined by a variation of CCT for 3,000, 4,500, and 6,000 K or combinations, and light distribution, either in a spot- or spatial way. Second, psychological light attributes should be associated with the same illumination and scenery settings. Finally, we created four driving environments with varying external levels of interest and time of the day. We identified three key results: (1) Four illumination groups could be classified by applying nMDS. (2) Combinations of mixed CCTs and spatial light distributions outperformed compared single light settings (p < 0.05), suggesting that also during daylight conditions artificial light supplements are necessary. (3) By an image transformation in the IPT and CAM16 color appearance space, comparing external and in-vehicle scenery, individual illumination working areas for each driving scenery could be identified, especially in the dimension of chroma-, partially following the Hunt-Effect, and lightness contrast, which synchronizes the internal and external brightness level. We classified our results as a starting point, which we intend to prove in a follow-up-controlled laboratory study with real object arrangements. Also, by applying novel methods to display high fidelity 360° rendered images on mobile access devices, our approach can be used in the future interdisciplinary research since high computational mobile devices with advanced equipped sensory systems are the new standard of our daily life. |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | in-vehicle illumination, psychological-light relation, light-scene preferences, dynamic-scenery, in-vehicle human factors |
Status: | Publisher's Version |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:tuda-tuprints-224980 |
Classification DDC: | 600 Technology, medicine, applied sciences > 620 Engineering and machine engineering |
Divisions: | 18 Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology > Adaptive Lighting Systems and Visual Processing |
Date Deposited: | 24 Oct 2022 13:09 |
Last Modified: | 14 Nov 2023 19:05 |
SWORD Depositor: | Deep Green |
URI: | https://tuprints.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/id/eprint/22498 |
PPN: | 500845050 |
Export: |
View Item |