TU Darmstadt / ULB / TUprints

A court file analysis of child protection cases: What do children say?

Kratky, Nicole ; Schröder‐Abé, Michela (2024)
A court file analysis of child protection cases: What do children say?
In: Child & Family Social Work, 2020, 25 (S1)
doi: 10.26083/tuprints-00015632
Article, Secondary publication, Publisher's Version

[img]
Preview
Text
CFS_CFS12744.pdf
Copyright Information: CC BY 4.0 International - Creative Commons, Attribution.

Download (842kB) | Preview
Item Type: Article
Type of entry: Secondary publication
Title: A court file analysis of child protection cases: What do children say?
Language: English
Date: 23 January 2024
Place of Publication: Darmstadt
Year of primary publication: 2020
Place of primary publication: Oxford
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons
Journal or Publication Title: Child & Family Social Work
Volume of the journal: 25
Issue Number: S1
DOI: 10.26083/tuprints-00015632
Corresponding Links:
Origin: Secondary publication DeepGreen
Abstract:

Children's participation in legal proceedings affecting them personally has been gaining importance. So far, a primary research concern has been how children experience their participation in court proceedings. However, little is known about the child's voice itself: Are children able to clearly express their wishes, and if so, what do they say in child protection cases? In this study, we extracted information about children's statements from court file data of 220 child protection cases in Germany. We found 182 children were asked about their wishes. The majority of the statements found came either from reports of the guardians ad litem or from judicial records of the child hearings. Using content analysis, three main aspects of the statements were extracted: wishes concerning main place of residence, wishes about whom to have or not contact with, and children granting decision‐making authority to someone else. Children's main focus was on their parents, but others (e.g., relatives and foster care providers) were also mentioned. Intercoder agreement was substantial. Making sure that child hearings are as informative as possible is in the child's best interest. Therefore, the categories developed herein might help professionals to ask questions more precisely relevant to the child.

Uncontrolled Keywords: children's participation, child protection, child's voice, child welfare, court files, family court
Status: Publisher's Version
URN: urn:nbn:de:tuda-tuprints-156321
Additional Information:

Special Issue: Parenting Across Diverse Contexts: Illuminating the Voices of Mothers, Fathers, and Children?

Classification DDC: 100 Philosophy and psychology > 150 Psychology
300 Social sciences > 300 Social sciences, sociology, anthropology
Divisions: 03 Department of Human Sciences > Institute for Psychology
Date Deposited: 23 Jan 2024 13:39
Last Modified: 29 Jan 2024 08:41
SWORD Depositor: Deep Green
URI: https://tuprints.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/id/eprint/15632
PPN: 515072206
Export:
Actions (login required)
View Item View Item