Vol.:(0123456789)1 3 Hydrogeology Journal (2024) 32:621–634 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-023-02760-0 REPORT A hydrogeological overview of the Upper Mega Aquifer System on the Arabian Platform Randolf Rausch1 · Heiko Dirks2 Received: 30 May 2023 / Accepted: 5 December 2023 / Published online: 2 January 2024 © The Author(s) 2023 Abstract With an extent of ~1,860,000 km2, the Upper Mega Aquifer System on the Arabian Platform forms one of the largest aquifer systems of the world. It is built up by several bedrock aquifers (sandstone and karstified limestone aquifers), which are imperfectly hydraulically connected to each other. The principal aquifers are the Wasia-Biyadh sandstone aquifer, and the karstified Umm Er Radhuma and Dammam limestone aquifers. The stored groundwater is mainly fossil. Groundwater recharge took place in the geologic past under more humid climatic conditions. Due to the good water quality and high yield, the aquifers are intensively exploited, which has caused depletion of the groundwater resources. The presented qualitative and semi-quantitative description of the hydrogeology and the groundwater budget is the basis for integrated groundwater management of the aquifer system. Keywords  Arabian platform · Arid regions · Groundwater management · Groundwater recharge/water budget · Multi-layer aquifer system Introduction The Arabian Peninsula faces significant water scarcity, which has been exacerbated by population growth, urbani- zation, and climate change. The region experiences arid and semi-arid climatic conditions, where groundwater resources are the primary source of freshwater. However, groundwater depletion is a major concern as the water demand continues to surpass replenishment rates. The Upper Mega Aquifer System is one of the major aqui- fer systems in the Arabian Peninsula, which spans across Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Oman, and Yemen. It is a critical resource for these countries as it provides freshwater for domestic use, agricultural production, and industrial activities. Under- standing the geology and hydrogeology of the Upper Mega Aquifer System is essential for its sustainable management and conservation. In this article, the geological and hydrogeological fea- tures of the Upper Mega Aquifer System are discussed. Fur- thermore, an examination of the current state of the aqui- fer system, the challenges faced in managing the resource, and potential solutions to ensure its sustainable use are described. Given the importance of the Upper Mega Aqui- fer System, it is crucial to explore ways to preserve this vital water resource for the well-being of communities, econo- mies, and the environment. Geological and hydrogeological overview Two main geological units can be distinguished on the Ara- bian Peninsula (Barth and Schliephake 1998; Thompson 2000; Grainger 2007). These are the Arabian Shield and the Arabian Platform (Fig. 1). The geologically oldest unit is the Arabian Shield in the west of the Arabian Peninsula. More recent is the Arabian Platform, which occupies the center and east of the Arabian Peninsula. The Arabian Shield consists of igneous and metamor- phic rocks of Precambrian age as well as volcanic rocks (so-called “harrats”) of Tertiary and younger age (Brown * Randolf Rausch randolf_rausch@yahoo.de 1 Technische Universität Darmstadt, Institute of Applied Geosciences, Schnittspahnstraße 8, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany 2 Ingenieurgesellschaft Prof. Kobus und Partner GmbH, Wilhelm‑Haas‑Straße 6, 70771 Leinfelden‑Echterdingen, Germany http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.1007/s10040-023-02760-0&domain=pdf 622 Hydrogeology Journal (2024) 32:621–634 1 3 et al. 1989). Alluvial fillings can be found in the valleys. There are no regionally significant groundwater resources on the Arabian Shield. The igneous and metamorphic rocks generally have a low yield. Medium yields are found in the “harrats” and in the alluvial of the valleys; however, due to the limited extent, these groundwater resources are only of local importance. The Arabian Platform is characterized by a thick sedimen- tary succession deposited on the basement from the Cambrian to the end of the Tertiary (Steineke and Bramkamp 1952; Powers et al. 1966; Sharland et al. 2001; Ziegler 2001). The rocks consist of carbonates, evaporites, mudstones, marls and sandstones forming a cuesta landscape (Rausch et al. 2014a). Deposition occurred during several transgressive-regressive cycles. Tectonic movements and cyclic sea level fluctuations led to repeated deposition of marine and terrestrial sediments. In the lower part of the sequence clastic sediments such as sandstones predominate, while in the upper part, biochemical and chemical sediments such as limestones, dolomites and evaporites predominate. The Arabian Peninsula is tectonically not stressed very much (Frisch and Meschede 2007). It is bordered to the south by the rift zones in the Red Sea and to the west by the Jor- dan Rift Transform Fault. To the north and east, the Arabian Peninsula is tectonically bounded by the subduction zone in southern Iran and the transform fault in the Arabian Sea. The rifting in the Red Sea leads to the tilting of the Arabian Penin- sula; the Phanerozoic sediments of the Arabian Platform dip at ~1° to the NE. The constant dip is interrupted on the Arabian Platform by north–south-trending anticlines and synclines, as well as salt diapirs in the Persian Gulf area. The main faults on the Arabian Shield strike in a northwest–southeast direction. Fig. 1   Simplified geological map of the Arabian Peninsula with locations of cross-sections A–C 623Hydrogeology Journal (2024) 32:621–634 1 3 The tectonic stability throughout the Phanerozoic led to relatively even sedimentation conditions on the Arabian Platform, and ultimately to the development of enormous oil and gas deposits and the formation of one of the largest aquifer systems on earth (De Sitter 1947). The aquifer system consists of several principal and sec- ondary aquifers that are imperfectly connected hydraulically to each other (Ministry of Agriculture and Water 1984; Pike 1985; Al Sharan et al. 2001; Wagner 2011; Rausch 2016). Groundwater-bearing sandstones and karstified limestones alternate with claystones and evaporites (gypsum and anhy- drite) of lower hydraulic conductivity and storage capacity. In general, the aquifers are very productive and the ground- water has a good quality. Due to their wide extent, these aquifers are of supra-regional importance (Margat and Van der Gun 2013; Van der Gun 2022). The aquifer system can be further subdivided into a Lower and an Upper Mega Aquifer System. Both systems are completely hydraulically separated from each other over large areas. The separating layer is formed by the anhydrites of the Upper Jurassic Hith formation. The Upper Mega Aquifer System The Upper Mega Aquifer System stretches from the Euphra- tes-Tigris Basin in Iraq, through Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Bah- rain, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Oman and Yemen. Its total area is ~1,860,000 km2. The morphology of the area is characterized by wide plains broken up by escarpments and a few small hills. In the south, the Rub’ Al Khali (“Empty Quarter”) desert, the largest sand desert in the world with an area of about 640,000 km2, determines the landscape. The geodetic heights range from sea level along the coast of the Persian Gulf to ~1,200 m above sea level (asl) in the Jawl Plateau in the south. The area lies almost entirely in the region of the tropic deserts of the northern hemisphere, whose climate is characterized by arid to hyperarid con- ditions (Köppen and Geiger 1936; Glennie 2005; Edgell 2006). The Upper Mega Aquifer System comprises a succes- sion of Cretaceous and Tertiary sediments. Hydrogeologi- cal cross-sections through the aquifer system are shown in Fig. 2. A brief description of the aquifer system with infor- mation on the lithology and hydraulic parameters is given in Fig. 3 (Kalbus et al. 2011; Hermes et al. 2014; Abdulrazzak and Elbaraasi 2017; Awadh et al. 2021; Ouda et al. 2017). In the lower part, the strata consist mainly of sandstones, while the upper part is composed of carbonates (limestone and dolomite) and evaporites (gypsum and anhydrite). The princi- pal aquifers are the Wasia-Biyadh Aquifer (Deckelmann et al. 2012), the Umm Er Radhuma Aquifer (Bakiewicz et al. 1982; Dirks et al. 2018; Alfy et al. 2019) and the Dammam Aquifer. Secondary aquifers are the Lower Cretaceous limestones of the Sulaiy-Yamama-Buwaib (Wolpert et al. 2015), the Aruma Aquifer and the Neogene Aquifer. These aquifers are sepa- rated from each other by several aquitards, the Shu’aiba and Aruma mudstones and the Rus. The sandstones of the Wasia-Biyadh Aquifer are only slightly consolidated and have a high primary porosity. The Wasia-Biyadh Aquifer is the most productive aquifer within the Upper Mega Aquifer System and contains the largest groundwater resources in storage. The upper part of the Umm Er Radhuma Aquifer is intensively karstified; it has only a slightly lower yield than the Wasia-Biyadh. Large amounts of groundwater are also stored in the Umm Er Rad- huma Aquifer. The hydraulic separation by the aquitards is not perfect. Cross formation flow is enabled by zones of higher vertical conductivity in the aquitards (hydraulic windows). These hydraulic windows are aligned to anticline structures. Due to the tectonic stress, the fissures are more intensive there and thus the permeability in the vertical direction is increased. In the case of gypsum and limestone, there is also an intensifi- cation of karstification, which further increases permeability (Dirks and Rausch 2008; Rausch et al. 2012). The aquifer base is formed over large areas by the thick anhydrite layers of the Hith formation. The Hith is missing in the north and extreme south, where the Upper Mega Aqui- fer System lies directly on top of the Lower Mega Aquifer System. Groundwater dynamics The general groundwater flow direction on the Arabian Plat- form follows the dip of the geological strata from southwest to northeast. This applies to all aquifers within the aquifer system, although there are large differences in the piezo- metric heads between the individual aquifers. The discharge areas are the Persian Gulf, coastal and inland sabkhas and springs in the east of the Arabian Platform. In the outcrop of the aquifers, i.e. in the areas with groundwater recharge, one observes a downward groundwa- ter movement, while further to the east in the direction of the discharge areas there is an upward groundwater movement. This flow pattern corresponds very well to the model of a regional aquifer system developed by Tóth (1963). For the aquifers of the Wasia-Biyadh, the Umm Er Rad- huma, and the Dammam, the piezometric head distributions and the corresponding groundwater flow directions are shown in Figs. 4, 5 and 6. The piezometric head differences between the Umm Er Radhuma, Dammam and Neogene aquifers are small, which is true for the outcrop areas of Umm Er Radhuma and Wasia-Biyadh aquifers; the differ- ence between the two aquifers reaches more than 200 m 624 Hydrogeology Journal (2024) 32:621–634 1 3 in the Persian Gulf area. There, the Aruma is developed in claystone facies forming an effective aquitard. The low rainfall on the outcrops of the Upper Mega Aquifer System results in a small amount of groundwater recharge. The Hith Aquiclude generally prevents inflow from the underlying Lower Mega Aquifer System. This is shown, among other things, by the large difference in the piezomet- ric heads of the Upper and Lower Mega Aquifer Systems: the piezometric heads of the underlying Dhruma Aquifer are more than 100 m higher over large areas of the Arabian Platform than those of the Wasia-Biyadh aquifer. A small inflow from the Lower into the Upper Mega Aquifer System exists to the north of the Arabian Platform, where the Hith Aquiclude is not developed. Wadis, which cut through the Jurassic escarpment land- scape in a west-east direction, bring further inflow and thus Fig. 2   Geological-hydrogeological cross-sections through the Arabian Platform (for location of cross-sections A-A', B-B', and C-C' refer to Fig. 1) 625Hydrogeology Journal (2024) 32:621–634 1 3 connect the outcrops of the Lower Mega Aquifer System (Palaeozoic – Jurassic) with those of the Upper Mega Aqui- fer System. This “bypass” of the Hith Aquiclude via Quater- nary wadi sediments is also the only outflow from the Lower Mega Aquifer System. The wadis transfer groundwater into the upper aquifers. Isotope investigations of the groundwater showed maxi- mum residence times of 20,000–30,000 years. The age of the groundwater increases in the direction of groundwater flow, with the highest ages measured on the coast of the Persian Gulf, in Qatar and in Bahrain. However, tritium is also found in the groundwater in the outcrop area, which proves recent, however small, groundwater recharge (Shampine et al. 1979; Wagner and Geyh 1999). Studies of stable isotopes (oxy- gen-18 and deuterium) show that groundwater was essen- tially formed when the climate was wetter than today. This means that the water stored in the aquifers is mostly “fossil groundwater” (Faulkner 1994; Michelsen et al. 2015). For ~5,000 years, after the end of the last pluvial period, the aquifer system has been depleting. Groundwater recharge is still less than the natural outflow from the aquifer sys- tem. The aquifer depletion is documented by the reduction in the artesian head of natural springs in Bahrain (Rausch et al. 2014a). Archaeological investigations of the historical irrigation system showed that in the last 4,000 years it has decreased from 12 to 2 m asl (Larsen 1983). On the main- land, former lakes and sabkahs document paleogroundwater levels. Hydrochemistry and groundwater quality The groundwater quality in the Upper Mega Aquifer Sys- tem generally develops from west to east according to the Chebotarev-Sequence (Chebotarev 1955a, b, c). The salin- ity increases continuously from the areas of groundwa- ter recharge (1,000–2,000 mg/L) to the outflow into the Persian Gulf (5,000–10,000 mg/L). Even in the outcrop area, the groundwater is mostly carbonate-saturated, with calcium and hydrogen carbonate being the dominant ions. Along the flow path, the solution of evaporites becomes more and more important, with increasing solution con- tent, calcium and sulfate become the most common ions. Even after gypsum saturation has been reached, ion exchange leads to a further increase in salinity, and the Fig. 3   Geological, lithological and hydrostratigraphical units of the Upper Mega Aquifer System. The corresponding hydraulic properties (hydraulic conductivity K, storage coefficient S, specific yield Sy), their representative average values and ranges are shown on the right side 626 Hydrogeology Journal (2024) 32:621–634 1 3 groundwater develops into sodium-chloride water in the east of the Arabian Platform (White 1965; Dirks 2007, Al-Sofyani 2018). The two uppermost aquifers are excluded from the trend of mineralization rising from west to east: In the Neogene and Dammam aquifers, sodium chloride water with a high salinity (5,000–10,000 mg/L) occurs almost exclusively; a Chebotarev-Sequence has not developed. In the Neogene aquifer, this is due to the heterogeneous lithology and the widely distributed groundwater recharge. The Dammam Aquifer, on the other hand, lacks outcrops in the west of the Arabian Platform; thus, groundwater recharges directly through precipitation. Groundwater inflow into the Dam- mam Aquifer occurs only through underlying and overlying aquifers. An exception to this is the Qatar Peninsula, where widespread Dammam outcrops occur and local ground- water recharge due to precipitation exists. The infiltrated rainwater forms freshwater lenses on the highly saline fossil groundwater. Figures 4, 5 and 6 show the development of minerali- zation in the principal aquifers. The subdivision is made into classes of total dissolved solids (TDS) in freshwa- ter (0–1,000 mg/L), slightly saline water (1,000–2,000 mg/L), moderately saline water (2,000–5,000 mg/L), saline water (5,000–18,000 mg/L) and highly saline water (>18,000mg/L). In the other limestone aquifers (Umm Er Radhuma, Aruma) and sandstone aquifers (Wasia, Biyadh), the Che- botarev sequence is well developed. With a similar evolu- tion of the overall mineralization, there are aquifer-specific features of water type and mineral content, mainly caused by variations in lithology and preferential groundwater flow paths along tectonic fault lines. In the Umm Er Radhuma Aquifer, for example, a tongue of freshwater (TDS < 2,000 Fig. 4   Piezometric head dis- tribution, general groundwater flow direction, and total dis- solved solids (TDS) in Wasia- Biyadh Aquifer 627Hydrogeology Journal (2024) 32:621–634 1 3 mg/L) extends along the Ghawar anticline to Al Hassa. In the area around Hafar Al Batin groundwater shows a higher mineralization (2,000–5,000 mg/L) already close to the out- crop, since evaporite layers occur towards the top of Umm Er Radhuma (Al Mussawi 2014). The hydrochemical development of the groundwater in the Upper Mega Aquifer System is overlaid to the east by physical processes: the high hydrostatic pressure in the aquifers leads to density differentiation and natural reverse osmosis (White 1965). The result is a strong mineraliza- tion of the groundwater up to 200,000 mg/L. The physical processes play a greater role in the lower aquifers (Wasia, Biyadh) than in the upper ones. In the Umm Er Radhuma Aquifer, for example, the high salinities are only reached below the Persian Gulf, while in Wasia and Biyadh simi- larly high mineralization already occurs below the mainland of Saudi Arabia. Besides physical processes, also chemical reactions in a hydrothermal environment may contribute to the observed high salinities (Ghomaa and Al Bassam 2021). At the beginning of the Pleistocene and in the interglacial periods, the sea level was up to 120 m higher than today. During these times, parts of the Arabian mainland were flooded, in particular the sea penetrated large parts of the Rub’ Al Khali desert. At sea level highs there was a sea con- nection from the Persian Gulf to the Arabian Sea not only through the Strait of Hormuz but also through the Rub’ Al Khali desert. Oman was then cut off from the Arabian Penin- sula and formed an island (Glennie and Singhvi 2002). The seawater intruded the aquifers and is possibly responsible for the sudden increase in salinity that can be observed today in the Rub’ Al Khali Desert along the Saudi Arabia-UAE border. However, the measured salinity of up to 200,000 mg/L is a multiple of the salinity of the sea; thus, additional processes such as concentration through evaporation or via Fig. 5   Piezometric head distribution, general ground- water flow direction, and total dissolved solids (TDS) in Umm Er Radhuma Aquifer 628 Hydrogeology Journal (2024) 32:621–634 1 3 the hydrophysical processes described previously must be assumed. The sandstone aquifers (Wasia, Biyadh) are characterized by a low hydraulic gradient, resulting in a low groundwater flow rate, and the absence of a true discharge area like the Persian Gulf. The outflow occurs into the overlying aqui- fers with flow through the aquitards. It is therefore assumed that there is still connate water in the eastern part of these aquifers. Hydraulic windows lead to groundwater exchange between the aquifers, which can be detected by anomalies in groundwater age and hydrochemical composition, e.g. in the lanthanide signature of the groundwater (Siebert et al. 2012). The dissolved proportions of the various lanthanides differ depending on whether the water, for example, has flowed through sandstone or limestone formation. These proportions no longer change once the solubility limit has been reached. In the Upper Mega Aquifer System, proven hydraulic windows exist in the Al Hassa and Yabrin areas where groundwater from the Umm Er Radhuma Aquifer enters the overlying aquifers and eventually exits to the sur- face (Al Tokhais and Rausch 2008; Rausch 2009). A number of springs existed in Al Hassa before the lowering of the groundwater level by anthropogenic extraction caused them to dry up (Al Tokhais et al. 2012). At Yabrin, the pressure level of the Umm Er Radhuma reaches just below the ground level; a large inland sabkha has formed. Water budget In recent decades, humans have massively intervened in the water budget of the Upper Mega Aquifer System. Above all, groundwater extraction for agricultural irrigation as well as Fig. 6   Piezometric head distribution, general ground- water flow direction, and total dissolved solids (TDS) in Dam- mam Aquifer 629Hydrogeology Journal (2024) 32:621–634 1 3 the injection of groundwater into deeper oil-bearing layers to maintain oil production, have made a major impact on the water budget. It therefore makes sense to differentiate between the historical situation (before the start of indus- trialization, around 1950) and the current situation when considering the water budget. Before the discovery of the oil and natural gas resources in the Middle East, neither the financial nor the technical possibilities existed for exploiting deeper aquifers. In historical times, anthropogenic ground- water abstraction was negligibly small and limited to the use of natural springs and shallow wells. At least since the 1970s there has been intensive pumping of the groundwa- ter, whereby the main user has been agriculture. Due to the intensive use of groundwater, a depletion of the groundwater resources on the Arabian Platform can be observed. The inflow and outflow components for the Upper Mega Aquifer System are: Inflow components: • Groundwater recharge from precipitation • Inflow through wadis from the Arabian Shield • Inflow of groundwater from underlying aquifers Outflow components: • Evaporation from inland and coastal sabkhas • Groundwater discharge from springs (only historical) • Inflow into the Persian Gulf • Anthropogenic groundwater abstraction for agricultural irrigation, industry and drinking water supply (only today). The individual water budget components are described in the following. The associated rates and an estimate of the relative uncertainties in their determination (Lloyd 2007; Rausch et al. 2010b) are listed in Table 1. The uncertainties describe the inaccuracy in the quantification of the respec- tive water budget terms. Together with the actual amount, it provides a benchmark for the sensitivity of the water budget in relation to the individual component. It also shows where further research and investigation is useful to improve quantification. Groundwater recharge from precipitation In the outcrop area of the Upper Mega Aquifer System, annual precipitation ranges from 180 to <60 mm/a (Dirks et al. 2012a). The lowest rainfall falls in the south in the Rub’ Al Khali desert and the temporal distribution of pre- cipitation is limited to sporadic events. Due to the high tem- perature, most of the precipitation evaporates; thus, only a small part contributes to groundwater recharge with surface runoff occuring, but generally only for a short time. Perennial watercourses do not exist. Own field and laboratory measure- ments (Schüth et al. 2010; Kallioras et al. 2010, 2011, 2012; Schulz et al. 2015a) and hydrologic calculations (Keim et al. 2008, 2012) as well as the results of other studies (Al Sharan et al. 2001) result in annual groundwater recharge rates of 0.5 mm/a to a maximum of 20 mm/a. The highest rates of groundwater recharge are found in the outcrop areas of the karstified limestones of the Umm Er Radhuma and the Dam- mam. The regional mean value for the Upper Mega Aquifer System is 2.2 mm/a. The mean annual groundwater recharge for the entire area is 129.9 m3/s—4,092 million cubic meters (MCM/a). It can be assumed that the groundwater recharge has changed little over the last 80 years, so that the ground- water recharge is almost the same for the time before large- scale groundwater abstraction and today. In the geological past, precipitation and thus groundwater recharge were significantly higher. Climatic conditions have changed over the past 10,000 years from weather conditions after the end of the last Ice Age to arid conditions that have Table 1   Water budget, components of the water budget and uncertainty of the budget components for predevelopment and present state. The unit MCM/a stands for million cubic meters per year. Totals and changes are in italic  Water budget component Predevelopment state Present state Uncertainty m3/s MCM/a m3/s MCM/a Groundwater recharge from precipitation 129.9 4,092 129.9 4,092 High Wadi inflow 2.0 63 1.5 47 Moderate Inflow from underlying aquifers 1.6 50 1.6 50 High Total inflow 133.5 4,205 133.0 4,189 - Evaporation from inland and coastal sabkhas 103.3 3,255 96.7 3047 Moderate Spring discharge 15.0 473 0.0 0 Low Outflow to Persian Gulf 12.0 378 10.0 315 High Agricultural irrigation 6.1 190 67.1 2,113 Low Domestic and industrial water supply 1.0 32 32.0 1,009 Low Total outflow 137.4 4,328 205.8 6,484 - Change in storage -3.9 -123 -72.8 -2,295 - 630 Hydrogeology Journal (2024) 32:621–634 1 3 persisted for ~5,000 years. During the “Pluvial Period”, which lasted from ~9,500 to 5,000 years, the average annual precipitation was between 350 and 450 mm/a. It can be assumed that at this time the groundwater recharge was 25–45 mm/a (Hötzl and Zötl 1978; Engelhardt et al. 2010, 2013a, b). Further humid phases occurred during the late Pleistocene, which had their maximum ~80,000, 100,000 and 125,000 years ago (Fleitmann et al. 2003, 2004; Beineke 2006; Rosenberg et al. 2011; Lüning and Vahrenholt 2019). Inflow through wadis Several wadis whose drainage basins include large parts of the Arabian Shield and subordinate older strata of the Ara- bian Platform drain into the drainage basin of the Upper Mega Aquifer System. From north to south, the four most important wadis are Wadi Ar Rimah and its eastern con- tinuation Wadi Al Batin, Wadi Hanifah and its continua- tion Wadi Sabha, Wadi Ad Dawasir, and Wadi Najran. The alluvial valley fillings of the wadis consist of unconsoli- dated gravel, sandy and clayey sediments and form local porous aquifers (Loschko and Rausch 2022). The ground- water inflow through these valley aquifers infiltrates into the underlying hard rock and contributes to groundwater recharge. The total groundwater flow is estimated at 2 m3/s (63 MCM/a) for the predevelopment state. Due to today’s intensive use of the alluvial aquifers, the inflow rate has been reduced to 1.5 m3/s (47 MCM/a). Groundwater inflow from underlying aquifers The Hith Aquiclude is not developed in the north and south of the study area, i.e. the separating layer between the Lower and Upper Mega Aquifer System is missing and an exchange of groundwater can occur there. The piezometric heads of the underlying aquifers are usually higher than those of the overlying layers; therefore, the groundwater flows from the underlying aquifers into the upper mega aquifer. One excep- tion would be the immediate outcrop areas, where there is an inflow from the Upper Mega Aquifer System downwards into the underlying aquifers. Overall, the inflow from the underlying aquifers outweighs the outflow into them. The net groundwater flow from the underlying aquifers into the Upper Mega Aquifer System can be estimated at 1.6 m3/s (50 MCM/a). Outflow from inland and coastal sabkhas Evaporation of rising groundwater from the sabkhas accounts for most of the natural outflow. It should be noted that when estimating evaporation from sabkhas, a distinction must be made between active and inactive sabkhas. Not all of today’s sabkha areas are still active. Quantifications of the evaporation rates vary between 100 and 520 mm/a (Schott et al. 2008, 2012; Schulz et al. 2015a). Evaporation from sabkhas is estimated at 103.3 m3/s (3,255 MCM/a) for the predevelopment time, and 96.7 m3/s (3,047 MCM/a) for the present. The lowering of the groundwater level as a result of the large groundwater withdrawals leads to a reduction in the active subsurface areas and thus to a reduction in the amount of water that evaporates. Spring discharge In the predevelopment state, prior to any major human activ- ities and before the introduction of motor pumps, artesian springs used to discharge at oases in the east of the study area and from undersea springs in the Persian Gulf. This state lasted until the 1960s. The largest oases in the study area are Al Hassa Oasis, Al Qatif Oasis and oases in the north of Bahrain Island. In the predevelopment state, the Al Hassa springs had a total discharge of about 10 m3/s (315 MCM/a; Al Tokhais and Rausch 2008; Al Tokhais et al. 2012; Rausch 2009). In the Al Qatif oasis, the discharge rate was ~1.6 m3/s (50 MCM/a). The springs of Bahrain (Rausch et al. 2008, 2010b, 2011, 2014b; Dirks et al. 2012b; Di Fusco 2021) had a discharge rate of 2.8 m3/s (88.3 MCM/a). In contrast, the discharge from the submarine springs was low (Groundwater Development Consultants, “Umm Er Radhuma Study”, unpublished report for the Ministry of Agriculture and Water, Riyadh, 1980). The discharge rate was ~0.01 m3/s (0.3 MCM/a). Taking into account smaller spring discharges not mentioned here, the total discharge from the springs can be estimated at 15 m3/s (473 MCM/a). Today, due to the heavy extraction of groundwater since the middle of the last century, all land springs have dried up. Only a few submarine springs can still be found in the Per- sian Gulf (Kortarba-Morley et al. 2010). Discharge to the Persian Gulf The Persian Gulf borders the aquifer system to the east. Flow to the Persian Gulf is estimated at 12 m3/s (378 MCM/a) for the predevelopment state. Due to the high groundwater abstraction rate in the inflow area, the current discharge rate has reduced to 10 m3/s (315 MCM/a). Groundwater abstraction for agricultural irrigation, industry and drinking water supply Historically, groundwater abstraction was limited to shal- low wells. A withdrawal of 6.1 m3/s (190 MCM/a) for agriculture and 1.0 m3/s (32 MCM/a) for drinking water is assumed; however, the withdrawals to date have risen drastically. The net agricultural groundwater abstraction from the Upper Mega Aquifer System is now at 67.1 m3/s 631Hydrogeology Journal (2024) 32:621–634 1 3 (2,113 MCM/a), and 32 m3/s (1,009 MCM/a) are abstracted for industry and drinking water. Total agricultural abstrac- tion is even higher: irrigation return flow is ~10% of total agricultural abstraction and, for budget considerations, the net agricultural abstractions need to be reduced. Return flows from sewage have not been considered. Agriculture has mostly settled in the places of historical oases, and due to the extensive use of the aquifers, it causes large- scale groundwater lowering of up to 150 m (Al Tokhais et  al. 2012). The other consequences are obvious: the deterioration of the groundwater quality due to the rise of saline deep water or seawater intrusions along the coast; an increase in production costs due to the need to drill deeper wells; and cases of land subsidence where groundwater is withdrawn from shallow aquifers. The destruction of the environment and the old oasis landscapes goes hand in hand with a loss of quality of life. Summary water budget Due to the increasing scarcity of the groundwater resources, the conflict between the users also increases. Agriculture, industry and drinking water supply compete today for the same groundwater resources. Furthermore, the water sup- ply for future generations must also be considered; today’s unsustainable consumption of groundwater resources is destroying the basis of life for future generations (Rausch 2021). Table 1 lists all inflow and outflow components of the water budget for the predevelopment and present states. The uncertainties with which the respective values can be determined are also listed. High uncertainties are associ- ated with components that cannot be directly measured— groundwater recharge, inflow from the underlying aquifer, and outflows to the Persian Gulf. Low uncertainties refer to components that could be verified by measurements. For historical spring discharge, measured values are docu- mented in the literature, and agricultural abstraction was verified on selected sites by field visits and then extrapo- lated by a remote sensing approach. Components with moderate uncertainties were estimated with the help of laboratory and field investigations (sabkha evaporation) and hydrogeological flow estimations (wadi inflow). An agricultural groundwater abstraction estimate is the most important component in the water budget. This estimate can be determined relatively precisely and forms a reli- able parameter in the water budget together with the withdrawals for domestic and industrial water consump- tion. Another important balance item is the groundwa- ter recharge from precipitation; however, it is associated with a high degree of uncertainty. Various infiltration processes take place and numerous parameters must be estimated. A focus of future research should therefore be to develop improved methods for more accurate quantifi- cation of groundwater recharge. Considering the Pleistocene climate history of the Ara- bian Peninsula, it can be assumed that the Upper Mega Aquifer System stored a maximum amount of groundwa- ter at the end of the last Pluvial ~5,000 years ago. Since that time, the aquifer system has been running dry, and an equilibrium has not yet been achieved between the ground- water levels and the groundwater recharge, which is greatly reduced under arid conditions (Schulz et al. 2017). In the water budget, this is expressed by the fact that the budget is negative even in the predevelopment state (–120 MCM/a). That means that the outflows from the system are higher than the inflows; however, it must be noted that the amount is small compared to the other water budget components, especially compared to the anthropogenic withdrawals. These abstractions increased continuously since the 1950s, making the water budget for today (2022) negative (–2,295 MCM/a). The large difference between inflow and outflow is at the expense of the stored groundwater volume and leads to a local groundwater drawdown of up to 150 m. The water budget clearly shows that the unsustainable use of fossil groundwater resources leads to “groundwater min- ing” (Rausch and Dirks 2019). Conclusions and outlook The Upper Mega Aquifer System is one of the largest aquifer systems of the world. It is built up by several bed- rock aquifers. Principal aquifers are the Wasia-Biyadh, the Umm Er Radhuma, and the Dammam. The stored groundwater is mainly fossil. Due to the good water qual- ity and high yield, the aquifers are intensively exploited, which leads to depletion of the groundwater resources. The presented hydrogeological overview is the result of a decade-long investigation of the aquifer system. Its data are the basis for a hydrogeological conceptual model of the Upper Mega Aquifer System and several mathemati- cal groundwater models of the aquifer system (Engelhard et al. 2010, 2013b, Schulz et al. 2017). These models could serve as a tool for integrated groundwater manage- ment of the Upper Mega Aquifer System (Al Saud and Rausch 2012; Siebert et al. 2016). Acknowledgements  For the many years of great cooperation and sup- port we are grateful to our colleagues and friends from the Ministry of Water and Electricity (MoWE, now MEWA) and to the people of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Funding  Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. 632 Hydrogeology Journal (2024) 32:621–634 1 3 Declarations  Conflicts of interest  The authors declare no conflicts of interest re- garding the publication of this paper. Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attri- bution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adapta- tion, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. References Abdulrazzak MJ, Elbaraasi H (2017) Integrated assessment of the Upper Mega Aquifer System, Yemen using remote sensing tech- niques and groundwater modeling. J Hydrol 11:61–74 Alfy ME, Lashin A, Faraj T, Altaway A, Tarawneh Q, Al Bassam A (2019) Quantitative hydro-geophysical analysis of a complex structural karst aquifer in eastern Saudi Arabia. Sci Rep 9:1–18 Al Mussawi WH (2014) Assessment of groundwater quality in Umm Er Radhuma aquifer (Iraqi Western Desert) by integration between irrigation water quality index and GIS. J Babylon Univ/Eng Sci 22(1):201–217 Al Saud M, Rausch R (2012) Integrated groundwater management in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Proceedings “Hydrogeology of arid environments”, Borntraeger, Stuttgart, Germany, pp 1–6 Al-Sofyani A (2018) Hydrogeochemical characterization and evalua- tion of groundwater resources in the Upper Mega Aquifer System, Saudi Arabia. J Afr Earth Sci 142:173–181 Al Sharan AS, Rizk ZA, Nairn AEM, Bakhit DW, Alhajari SA (2001) Hydrogeology of an arid region: the Arabian Gulf and adjoining areas. Elsevier, Amsterdam Al Tokhais AS, Rausch R (2008) The hydrogeology of Al Hassa Springs. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Water Resources and Arid Environments 2008 and the 1st Arab Water Forum, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, pp 1–16 Al Tokhais AS, Rausch R, Dirks H (2012) The hydrogeology of Al Hassa Springs in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: a case study for the depletion of an aquifer. Proceedings “Hydrogeology of arid environments”. Borntraeger, Stuttgart, Germany, 193 pp Awadh SM, Al-Mimar H, Yaseen ZM (2021) Groundwater availability and water demand sustainability over the upper mega aquifers of Arabian Peninsula and west region of Iraq. Environ Dev Sustain 23:1–21 Bakiewicz W, Milne DM, Noori M (1982) Hydrogeology of the Umm Er Radhuma aquifer, Saudi Arabia, with reference to fossil gradi- ents. Q J Eng Geol 15:105–126 Barth HK, Schliephake K (1998) Saudi Arabien [Saudi Arabia]. Klett- Perthes, Stuttgart, Germany Beineke J (2006) Spät-Quartäre Paläogeographie der Arabischen Hal- binsel [Late Quaternary paleogeography of the Arabian Penin- sula]. PhD Thesis, Univ. Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany Brown GF, Schmidt DLA, Huffman C (1989) Geology of the Arabian Peninsula: shield area of western Saudi Arabia. US Geol Surv Prof Pap 560 Chebotarev II (1955a) Metamorphism of natural waters in the crust of weathering: 1. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 8(1–2):22–32 Chebotarev II (1955b) Metamorphism of natural waters in the crust of weathering: 2. 8(3):137–170 Chebotarev II (1955c) Metamorphism of natural waters in the crust of weathering: 3. 8(4):198–212 De Sitter LU (1947) Diagenesis of oil-field brines. Bull Am Assoc Pet Geol 31(11):2030–2040 Deckelmann A, Al Khalifa A, Rausch R (2012) Hydrogeology of the Wasia-Biyadh aquifer, Saudi Arabia. Proceedings “Hydrogeology of arid environments”. Borntraeger, Stuttgart, Germany, 206 pp Di Fusco C (2021) Les sources de Dilmun: naissance de la civilisation des deux mers [The Dilmun springs: birth of the civilization of the two seas]. MSc Thesis, ENSA Paris Malaquais, Paris Dirks H (2007) Hydrochemistry of the tertiary aquifer system in the eastern part of the Arabian Peninsula. Diploma Thesis, TU- Darmstadt, Germany Dirks H, Rausch R (2008) The role of geological expertise in the characterization of regional aquifer systems. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Water Resources and Arid Environments 2008 and the 1st Arab Water Forum, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Dirks H, Keim B, Lorenz M, Shabebe I, Rausch R (2012a) EDK- interpolation von Niederschlagsdaten mit Hilfe von TRMM- Daten [Using TRMM data for EDK-interpolation of precipita- tion data]. FHDGG-Tagung, Dresden, Germany, May 2012 Dirks H, Rausch R, Kallioras A, Schüth C (2012b) The riddle of the springs of Dilmun: does the Gilgamesh epic tell the truth? IWA Specialized Conference on Water and Wastewater Technologies in Ancient Civilizations, Istanbul, March 2012, pp 119–126 Dirks H, Al Ajmi H, Kienast P, Rausch R (2018) Hydrogeology of the Umm Er Radhuma aquifer (Arabian Peninsula). Grundwas- ser 23:5–15 Edgell HS (2006) Arabian deserts: nature, origin and evolution. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands Engelhardt I, Rausch R, Schüth C, Keim B (2010) Impact of climate change since the last ice-age on the groundwater resources of South-East Saudi Arabia. Schriftenreihe der Deutschen Gesells- chaft für Geowissenschaften, FH-DGG-Tagung Tübingen, Grundwasser für die Zukunft, Heft 67, Hannover, Germany Engelhardt I, Rausch R, Lang U, Al Saud M, Schüth C (2013a) Impact of Preboreal to Subatlantic shifts in climate on ground- water resources on the Arabian Peninsula. Environ Earth Sci 69(2):557-570 Engelhardt I, Rausch R, Keim B, Al Saud M, Schüth C (2013b) Sur- face and subsurface conceptual model of an arid environment with respect to mid- and late Holocene climate changes. Environ Earth Sci 69(2):537-555 Faulkner RD (1994) Fossil water or renewable resource: the case for one Arabian aquifer. Water Maritime Energ 106:325–331 Fleitmann D, Burns SJ, Mudelsee M, Neff U, Kramers J, Magini A, Matter A (2003) Holocene forcing of the Indian monsoon record in a stalagmite from southern Oman. Science 300:1737–1739 Fleitmann D, Matter A, Pint JJ, Al-Shanti MA (2004) The speleo- them record of climate change in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Geologi- cal Survey, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, pp 1–40 Frisch W, Meschede M (2007) Plattentektonik: Kontinentalverschie- bung und Gebirgsbildung [Plate tectonics: continental drift and mountain formation], 2nd edn. Primus, Zurich, Switzerland Glennie KW (2005) The desert of Southeast Arabia. Gulf PetroLink, Manama, Bahrain Glennie KW, Singhvi A (2002) Event stratigraphy, paleoenvironment and chronology of SE Arabian deserts. Quat Sci Rev 21:853–869 Gomaah M, Al Bassam A (2021) Geochemistry and origin of the hyper salinity of groundwater in Wasia-Biyadh aquifer, Saudi Arabia. J Geosci Environ Protect 9:1–14 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 633Hydrogeology Journal (2024) 32:621–634 1 3 Grainger D (2007) The geological evolution of Saudi Arabia: a voy- age through space and time. Saudi Geological Survey, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia Hermes C, Rausch R, Reichert B, Dirks H (2014) Analysis of geo- hydraulic properties of the “Upper Mega Aquifer-System” on the Arabian Peninsula from pumping test data. Poster, FHDGG- Tagung 2014, Bayreuth, Germany Hötzl H, Zötl JG (1978) Climatic changes during the Quaternary period. In: Al-Sayari SS, Zötl JG (eds) Quaternary period in Saudi Arabia I: sedimentological, hydrogeological, Hydrochemical, geo- morphological, and climatological investigations in central and eastern Saudi Arabia. Springer, Vienna, pp 301–311 Kalbus E, Oswald SE, Wang W, Kolditz O, Engelhardt I, Al Saud MI, Rausch R (2011) Large-scale modeling of the groundwater resources on the Arabian platform. Int J Water Resour Arid Envi- ron 1(1):38–47 Kallioras A, Piepenbrink M, Schüth C, Pfletschinger H, Dietrich P, Koeniger F, Rausch R (2010) Quantification of groundwater recharge through application of pilot techniques in the unsaturated zone. EGU General Assembly 2010, Vienna, May 2010. Geophys Res Abst 12, EGU 2010-14252 Kallioras A, Khan A, Reshid M, Todoroff P, Pfletschinger H, Schüth C, Rausch R, Al Saud M (2011) Investigation of groundwater recharge through unsaturated zone studies in arid regions. Geo- phys Res Abstr 13, EGU2011-13475 Kallioras A, Piepenbrink M, Khan A, Reshid M, Rausch R, Dietrich P, Schüth C (2012) Investigation of isotopic signals in the unsatu- rated zone with the use of direct push technology and azaeotropic distillation. Acque Sotterranee-Ital J Groundw 12:39–46 Keim B, Pfäfflin H, Rausch R (2008) Ermittlung der Grundwas- serneubildung in semiariden und ariden Gebieten [Estimation of groundwater recharge in semi-arid and arid regions]. FH-DGG- Tagung 2008, Göttingen, Germany, May 2008, Schriftenreihe der Deutschen Geol. Gesellsch Geowissensch Heft 57, 83 pp Keim B, Rausch R, Al-Saud M, Pfäfflin H, Bárdossy A, Bendel D, Lor- enz M (2012) Large scale groundwater recharge estimation with hydrological models in arid environments: case study Arabian Peninsula. Proceedings “Hydrogeology of arid environments”. Borntraeger, Stuttgart, Germany, pp 60–64 Köppen W, Geiger G (1936) Handbuch der Klimatologie in 5 Bänden [Handbook of climatology in 5 volumes]. Borntraeger, Berlin Kortarba-Morley AM, Morley M, Carter R (2010) Freshwater sub- marine springs of Bahrain: threatened heritage. Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, England Larsen CE (1983) Life and land use on the Bahrain Islands: the geoar- cheology of an ancient society. Prehistoric Archeology and Ecol- ogy Series, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago Lloyd JW (2007) The difficulties of regional groundwater resources assessments in arid areas. Arab J Sci Eng 32(1C):35–47 Loschko M, Rausch R (2022) Contributions to Wadi hydrogeology in arid regions: experiences from the Arabian Peninsula. Poster 28 Tagung der Fachsektion Hydrogeologie in der DGGV, Friedrich- Schiller-Universität, Jena, Switzerland Lüning S, Vahrenholt F (2019) Holocene climate development of North Africa and the Arabian Peninsula. In: The geology of the Arab world: an overview. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, pp 507–546 Margat J, Van der Gun J (2013) Groundwater around the world: a geo- graphic synopsis. CRC, Boca Raton, FL Michelsen N, Reshid M, Siebert C, Schulz S, Knöller K, Weise S, Rausch R, Al Saud M, Schüth C (2015) Isotopic and chemical composition of precipitation in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Chem Geol 413(12):51–62 Ministry of Agriculture and Water (1984) Water atlas of Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabian Printing, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Ouda B, El-Rawy MB, Al-Sulaimi J (2017) Hydrogeological and hydrochemical framework of the Upper Mega Aquifer System, Oman. Water Resour Manag 31(3):797–813 Pike JG (1985) Groundwater resources and development in the cen- tral region of the Arabian gulf. Hydrogeology in the Service of Man, International Association of Hydrogeologists, Goring, UK, pp 46–55 Powers RW, Ramirez LF, Redmond CD, Elberg EL (1966) Geology of the Arabian Peninsula: sedimentary geology of Saudi Arabia. US Geol Surv Prof Pap 560-D, 147 pp Rausch R (2009) Zur Hydrogeologie der Al Hassa Oase auf der Ara- bischen Halbinsel [Hydrogeology of the Al Hassa Oasis on the Arabian Peninsula]. Schriftenreihe der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Geowissenschaften GeoDresden2009, Heft 63, 125 pp Rausch R, Dirks H, Trautmann K (2008) Die artesischen Quellen von Dilmun [The artesian springs of Dilmun]. Geoarchäologie, Spektrum der Wissenschaft, pp 62–69. https://​www.​spekt​rum.​de/​ magaz​in/​die-​artes​ischen-​quell​en-​von-​dilmun/​951087. Accessed December 2023 Rausch R, Teutsch G, Schüth C (2010a) Unsicherheiten bei der Abschätzung von Grundwasserressourcen und der Grundwasser- bilanz arider Gebiete [Uncertainties in estimating groundwater resources and groundwater balances in arid regions]. FH-DGG- Tagung Tübingen - Grundwasser für die Zukunft, Heft 67, SDGG, Hanover, Germany, 39 pp Rausch R, Dirks H, Trautmann K (2010b) Les sources taries de l’île de Bahreïn [The dry springs of Bahrain island]. Pour la science, no. 395. Septembre 2010:70–76. https://​www.​pourl​ascie​nce.​fr/​ sd/​geosc​iences/​les-​sourc​es-​taries-​de-l-​ile-​de-​bahre​in-​1833.​php. Accessed December 2023 Rausch R, Dirks H, Trautmann K (2011) Las aguas artesianas de Dilmún [The artesian waters of Dilmun]. Invest Cien 419:60–67 Rausch R, Dirks H, Höfer-Öllinger G (2012) Aquifer genesis as a key for the understanding of hydrogeological processes. 29th IAS meeting of sedimentology, Schladming, Austria, September 2012 Rausch R, Simon T, Al Ajmi H, Dirks H (2014a) The scarp lands of Saudi Arabia. Arab J Geosci 7(6):2437–2450 Rausch R, Dirks H, Kallioras A, Schüth C (2014b) The riddle of the springs of Dilmun: does the Gilgamesh epic tell the truth? - his- torical note. Groundwater 52(4):640–644 Rausch R (2016) The hydrogeology of the “Upper Mega Aquifer Sys- tem” on the Arabian Peninsula. Grundwasser - mensch -Oekosys- teme, FHDGG-Tagung 2016 in Karlsruhe, Germany, April 2016, pp 49–50 Rausch R, Dirks H, (2019) Eine Fallstudie zum „Groundwater Mining“ fossilen Grundwassers auf der Arabischen Halbinsel [“Ground- water Mining” of fossil groundwater: a case study from the Ara- bian Peninsula]. Geographie in Wissenschaft und Praxis, Band 5, Schriftenreihe der Hochschule für Forstwirtschaft, Rottenburg, Germany, pp 237–254 Rausch R (2021) Das höchste gut im Wüstenkönigreich: Wasser- vorkommen und Abwasseraufkommen in Saudi Arabien [The most valuable commodity in the desert kingdom: water resources and wastewater in Saudi Arabia]. In: Leppert S (ed) Richard Böde- ker: Ein deutscher Landschaftsarchitekt in Saudi-Arabien. Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart, Germany, pp 146–153 Rosenberg TM, Preusser F, Fleitmann D, Schwalb A, Penkman K, Schmid TW, Al Shanti MA, Kadi K, Matter A (2011) Humid periods in southern Arabia: windows of opportunity for modern human dispersal. Geol Soc Am 39(12):1115–1118 Schott U, Faber P, Jensen H, Rausch R (2008) Groundwater Evapo- ration from Sabkhas in the Northern Rub’ Al Khali Desert: identification and characterization of active sabkha areas. FH- DGG-Tagung 2008, Heft 57, Schriftenreihe der Deutschen Geol. Gesellschaft für Geowissenschaften, Hanover, Germany, 170 pp https://www.spektrum.de/magazin/die-artesischen-quellen-von-dilmun/951087 https://www.spektrum.de/magazin/die-artesischen-quellen-von-dilmun/951087 https://www.pourlascience.fr/sd/geosciences/les-sources-taries-de-l-ile-de-bahrein-1833.php https://www.pourlascience.fr/sd/geosciences/les-sources-taries-de-l-ile-de-bahrein-1833.php 634 Hydrogeology Journal (2024) 32:621–634 1 3 Schott U, Faber P, Rausch R (2012) Wasser unter der Wüste [Water below the desert]. In: Der Geologische Kalender 2012, Wasser in der Wüste, DGG, Hanover, Germany Schüth C, Kallioras A, Piepenbrink M, Pfletschinger H, Al-Ajmi H, Engelhardt I, Rausch R, Al-Saud M (2010) New approaches to quantify groundwater recharge in arid areas. The 4th Interna- tional Conference on Water Resources and Arid Environments (ICWRAE), Riyadh, December 2010, pp 1–7 Schulz S, Horovitz M, Rausch R, Michelsen N, Köhne M, Siebert C, Schüth C, Al Saud M, Merz R (2015a) Groundwater evaporation from salt pans: examples from the eastern Arabian Peninsula. J Hydrol 531(3):792–801 Schulz S, De Rooij GH, Michelsen N, Rausch R, Siebert C, Schüth C, Al Saud M, Merz R (2015b) Estimating groundwater recharge for an arid karst system using a combined approach of time lapse camera monitoring and water balance modelling. Hydrogeol Proc 30(5):771–782 Schulz S, Walther M, Michelsen N, Rausch R, Dirks H, Al-Saud M, Merz R, Kolditz O, Schüth C (2017) Improving large-scale groundwater models by considering fossil gradients. Adv Water Resour 103:32–43 Shampine WJ, Dincer T, Noory M (1979) An evaluation of isotope concentrations in the groundwater of Saudi Arabia. Isotope Hydrol II(1978):443–463 Sharland PR, Archer R, Casey DM, Davies RB, Hall SH, Heward AP, Horbury AD, Simmond MD (2001) Arabian plate sequence stra- tigraphy. GeoArabia, Spec. Publ. 2, Gulf PetroLink, Bahrain Siebert C, Rödiger T, Rausch R, Döhler J, Michelsen N, Al-Saud M (2012) The Upper Mega Aquifer System on the Arabian Penin- sula: delineation of sub-aquifer interaction using hydrochemical and REE+Y patterns. Proceedings of “Hydrogeology of arid envi- ronments”, Borntraeger, Stuttgart, Germany, pp 154–157 Siebert C, Rödiger T, Schulz S, Horovitz M, Merz R, Friesen J, Dietrich P, Michelsen N, Kallioras A, Rausch R, Engelhardt I, Al-Saud M, Schüth C (2016) New tools for coherent information base for IWRM in arid regions: the Upper Mega Aquifer System on the Arabian Peninsula. In: Integrated water resources man- agement: concept, research and implementation. Springer, Cham, Switzerland, pp 85–106 Steineke M, Bramkamp RA (1952) Geology of the Arabian Peninsula: sedimentary geology of Saudi Arabia. US Geol Surv Prof Pap 560-D. https://​doi.​org/​10.​3133/​pp560D Thompson A (2000) Origins of Arabia. Stacey, London Tóth J (1963) A theoretical analysis of groundwater flow in small drain- age basins. J Geophys Res 68(10):4795–4812 Van der Gun J (2022) Large aquifer systems around the world. The Groundwater Project, Guelph, ON Wagner W (2011) Groundwater in the Arab Middle East. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany Wagner W, Geyh MA (1999) Application of environmental isotope methods for groundwater studies in the ESCWA region. Geol Jb C 67:5–129 White DE (1965) Saline waters of sedimentary rocks. In: Young A, Galley JE (eds) Fluids in subsurface environments. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, pp 342–366 Wolpert P, Bartenbach M, Suess P, Rausch R, Aigner T, Le Nindre Y-M (2015) Facies analysis and sequence stratigraphy of the uppermost Jurassic-lower Creataceous Sulaiy Formation in out- crops of Central Saudi Arabia. GeoArabia 20(4):67–122 Ziegler MA (2001) Late Permian to Holocene Paleofacies evolution of the Arabian plate and its hydrocarbon occurrences. GeoArabia 6(3):445–504 Publisher’s note  Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. https://doi.org/10.3133/pp560D A hydrogeological overview of the Upper Mega Aquifer System on the Arabian Platform Abstract Introduction Geological and hydrogeological overview The Upper Mega Aquifer System Groundwater dynamics Hydrochemistry and groundwater quality Water budget Groundwater recharge from precipitation Inflow through wadis Groundwater inflow from underlying aquifers Outflow from inland and coastal sabkhas Spring discharge Discharge to the Persian Gulf Groundwater abstraction for agricultural irrigation, industry and drinking water supply Summary water budget Conclusions and outlook Acknowledgements References